If you have trouble reading this newsletter, view the web version here

   

IACH NEWS OF THE WEEK

February 23, 2026
Prepared by Dr Edwin Uriel Suárez

Long-Term Survivorship After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies [Review].

Here, the authors provide an interesting roadmap for the care of patients in long-term remission after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies.

 

Key points:

●      Infections are a major complication of CAR T-cell therapy, occurring in 20%-60% of CAR T-cell recipients.

●      17% of patients with lymphoma required hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics between 6 and 12 months after CAR T-cell therapy, and 10% between 1 and 2 years after infusion.

●      Among patients with lymphoma, recovery of normal B cells typically occurs in 50%-70% by 1 year after therapy, with a greater proportion recovering by 3 years. By contrast,  B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted CAR T-cell therapy depletes plasma cells, which are critical for maintaining existing humoral immunity. This may account for increased late infections in this patient population; however, responses to new vaccination can still occur.

o   Revaccination with nonlive vaccines is reasonable to consider beginning 3-6 months postinfusion and is more likely to be effective in patients demonstrating B-and T-cell reconstitution.

●      There are no data supporting cytomegalovirus prophylaxis (ie, letermovir), but this warrants further evaluation.

●      Recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis mainly rely on retrospective experiences and extrapolations from the transplant literature. The authors recommended prophylactic fluoroquinolones for patients with prolonged, severe neutropenia.

●      For herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus prevention, they use acyclovir or valacyclovir for at least 6 months and often longer in patients with prolonged B-cell aplasia who do not generate humoral responses to the zoster vaccine.

●      Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or atovaquone for at least 6 months, and continue until the CD4 count is >200 cells/mm, to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii infection.

●      Antimold azoles are recommended for those with risk factors such as prolonged cytopenias, prolonged steroid use, or a history of invasive fungal infections, which, although rare, can be life-threatening.

●      For patients receiving plasma cell–directed therapies, prophylactic immunoglobulin replacement is recommended until IgG levels recover above 400 mg/dL. For CD19 CAR T-cell therapy survivors, replacement for IgG levels ≤400 mg/dL is recommended for those with recurrent infections.

●      See Figure 2 in original paper, which illustrates the recommended workup and management of post–CAR T-cell cytopenia.

●      Long-term data indicate a 4%-16% incidence of secondary malignancies after CAR T-cell therapy. While these rates are comparable with those seen with conventional treatments for hematologic cancers, the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Contributing factors may include previous genotoxic therapies, CAR T–induced inflammation, prolonged B-cell aplasia, immunosuppression, and pre-existing clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP).

●      Adherence to age-appropriate cancer screening, including dermatologic screening, per national guidelines, should be a core component of long-term care. For individuals with prolonged cytopenias, poor immune reconstitution, or known CHIP, more frequent and individualized monitoring may be warranted. As we gain deeper insights into the interplay between CAR-T-cell therapy, CHIP, and long-term immune dysfunction, personalized surveillance frameworks will be essential for mitigating late toxicities and optimizing outcomes for CAR T-cell recipients.

●      See Table 2 in original paper for key questions and proposed approaches for survivorship post–CAR T-cell therapies. 

Click for the full article

Time of infusion does not significantly impact outcomes following CAR T-cell therapy in large B-cell lymphoma [Retrospective study].  

Highlights:

●      The potential impact of chronobiology on cancer treatment efficacy is both controversial and intriguing.

●      Two large, multicentre, retrospective real-world clinical studies, recently published, both suggest a significant clinical impact of infusion time on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell outcomes.

●      In this study, the authors found no association between the timing of CAR T-cell infusion and the outcomes of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL).

 

The study reviewed 584 consecutive patients with LBCL who received autologous CD19-directed CAR-T cell (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cell] or tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel]) infusion between January 2020 and December 2024 at six centres participating in the Australian CAR-T Real-World Consortium to evaluate outcomes by time of infusion. The primary analysis was of progression-free survival (PFS) from date of CAR T-cell infusion in patients infused prior to vs after midday. Median age was 66, 68% received axi-cel, and 32% tisa-cel. The median infusion time was 13:20 hours (interquartile range 11:45–14:26, range 8:55–18:00).  168 patients (29%) received morning infusions while 417 (71%) received afternoon infusions. Characteristics of patients who received morning infusions were similar to those of patients who received afternoon infusions, including histology, prior therapy, refractoriness, and performance status. A higher proportion of afternoon infusions were axi-cel (73% vs 54%, p<0.01). Median follow-up was 20 months. There was no significant difference in PFS between patients receiving afternoon versus morning infusions on univariable or multivariable analyses (hazard ratio, [95% confidence interval] 0.90 [0.71–1.16], p=0.42). 

Click for the full article

Phase 2 trial of rituximab with either pentostatin or bendamustine for multiply relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukemia.

Highlights:

●      Durable complete remission (CRs) and minimal residual disease free (MRDfree) CRs were achieved with pentostatin-rituximab (DCFR) and bendamustine-rituximab (BR).

●      Possible superiority of DCFR was hypothesis-generating and might mainly apply to patients who are less pretreated and have a lower disease burden.

 

56 patients received 6 x 28-day cycles of rituximab (375 mg/m2, days 1 and 15) with either bendamustine (90 mg/m2, days 1 and 2) or pentostatin (4 mg/m2, days 1 and 15). Eligibility required ≥2 purine analogs, or 1 purine analog plus rituximab for response of <1 year to the initial purine analog. Although patients were randomized to either regimen to increase homogeneity of the 2 treatment groups, the DCFR arm had fewer prior purine analogs (P=0.021) and lower baseline marrow hairy cell leukemia/variant (HCL/HCLv) infiltration (P=0.013). Overall response rates for DCFR and BR were 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83-102) and 86% (95% CI, 73-99), respectively, exceeding 40% in each group (P<0.0001). Rates for CR and MRDfree CR and median progression-free survival (141 vs 50 months; hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.32-1.25) numerically favored DCFR, but that arm was significantly enriched with fewer previous purine analogs and marrow infiltration, each of which was associated post hoc with better response. DCFR and BR were highly effective in multiply relapsed HCL/HCLv. 

Click for link 1
Click for link 2

Intranasal fentanyl and impact of an emergency department pain protocol for sickle cell disease on hospitalization rates [Retrospective unicentric study].  

Highlights: Standardized emergency department (ED) pain protocols with intranasal (IN) fentanyl (INF) improve time to first analgesia dose in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) pain. Protocol implementation was associated with a reduction in hospital admission rates for pain.

 

A preintervention/postintervention study of patients with SCD (aged 0-21 years) presenting to a pediatric ED for uncomplicated vaso-occlusive crisis pain from 2015 to 2019 was conducted. Overall, 162 patients accounted for 471 ED visits in the preintervention period and 80 patients accounted for 162 visits in the postintervention period. After intervention, hospitalization rates (P=0.0017) and inpatient length of stay (P=0.0019) decreased, but median pain scores at presentation and discharge remained comparable. The time to initial analgesia dose significantly improved postintervention (P<0.0001), as did the time from physician order to initial analgesia administration (P=0.0005). Intravenous/IN analgesia use rose significantly in the postintervention (odds ratio [OR], 4.7; P<0.0001), with INF being the preferred analgesic agent (61%), with a corresponding reduction in oral analgesic use (OR, 0.2; P<0.0001).

Click for the full article

Pivekimab Sunirine in Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm [Phase I/II open-label clinical trial].  

Highlights: 

●      Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a unique myeloid malignancy characterized by CD123 (interleukin-3 receptor-a) overexpression and a poor prognosis.

●      This phase I/II open-label, multicenter study evaluated pivekimab sunirine (PVEK), a novel CD123 antibody-drug conjugate, in adults with frontline or relapsed/refractory (R/R) BPDCN.

●      PVEK, with convenient dosing, led to high, durable responses, especially in frontline BPDCN, and a manageable safety profile.

 

The primary end point in the primary analysis population (PAP; frontline de novo) was composite complete response (CRR; CR + clinical CR) rate. Of 84 patients, 33 had frontline BPDCN (22 de novo [20 in primary PAP]; 11 with previous or concomitant malignancy) and 51 had R/R disease. The median (range) age was 72 (63-76) years. In the PAP the CCR rate was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51 to 91; n=15; median duration: 10.6 [95% CI, 3.8 to not reached] months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 16.6 (95% CI, 7.2 to not reached) months. Eight of these 15 (53%) patients underwent stem cell transplant. The corresponding rate for R/R disease was 14% (95% CI, 6 to 26; n=7; median duration: 9.2 [95% CI, 2.4 to not reached] months), and the median OS was 5.8 (95% CI, 3.9 to 8.4) months. Grade ≥3 events included neutropenia (16%), thrombocytopenia (14%), and peripheral edema (12%). Serious adverse events included pneumonia (6%) and febrile neutropenia (5%). Two on-treatment cases of reversible veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred. Of the total 19 patients who proceeded to SCT, VOD was reported in five patients (four with R/R BPDCN).

Click for link 1
Click for link 2

IACH Webinars

Stay tuned for the upcoming IACH webinars

Click here

For questions please contact:
info@clinical-hematology.org


If you prefer not to receive future email communications from us, please unsubscribe here

This newsletter was sent using ITnewsletter