If you have trouble reading this newsletter, view the web version here

   

IACH NEWS OF THE WEEK

December 22, 2025
Prepared by Dr Edwin Uriel Suárez

MaaT013 for ruxolitinib-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease with gastrointestinal involvement: Results from the ARES phase III trial.

Highlights:

Results from the ARES study demonstrate that MaaT013 (microbiotherapy) induces frequent and deep responses translating into prolonged survival and an acceptable safety profile in patients with refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) who previously failed both systemic steroids and ruxolitinib, a population characterized by poor clinical outcomes with limited therapeutic options.


Here, the authors report primary efficacy and safety results from ARES (with a data cut-off of 11 November 2024), a multicenter, open-label, pivotal, phase III study exploring the pooled allogeneic microbiotherapy MaaT013 in participants with refractory gastrointestinal (GI)-aGvHD previously treated with systemic steroids and ruxolitinib.  At data cut-off, 66 adult subjects with grade II-IV GI-aGvHD received at least one MaaT013 dose (median number of doses=3; range, 1-4). Median age at informed consent was 55.5 years (range, 24-76). 53% were male. Most subjects presented with grade III (58%, n=38) or IV (33%, n=22) aGvHD. The study met its primary endpoint of GI overall response rate (GI-ORR), based on the MAGIC criteria with a day 28 (D28) GI-ORR of 62% (n=41), significantly higher than the pre-established 22% threshold (P<0.0001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.74). Responses for all-organ ORR were similarly frequent with D28 ORR of 64% (n=42). Average duration of response was 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.8 to 8.0). The estimated overall survival was 59% at month six and 54% at month 12.  MaaT013 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile despite the vulnerability of subjects with refractory GI-aGvHD. 

Link to meeting abstract
Link to ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04769895

Randomized Noninferiority Trial of a Liberalized Diet Versus the Neutropenic Diet in Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Patients and Patients With Acute Leukemia [Phase III Clinical Trial]. 

Highlights:  

●      These findings suggest that a more liberalized diet (LD) is not a safe alternative to a neutropenic diet (ND) in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation patients and patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia because of increased infection risk without nutritional or other benefit.

●      The trial was stopped because patients receiving the LD experienced more major infections, exceeding the prespecified noninferiority boundary. 

 

In this phase III noninferiority trial, patients were randomly assigned to either an ND or LD. The ND did not permit consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables. LD arm patients were encouraged to eat at least one daily serving of fresh fruits and/or vegetables and were permitted to eat pasteurized yogurt (without other differences); Supplementary Table S1 (link to original publication) details the composition of the two diets. The primary end point was the development of any major infection during neutropenia. The trial was halted at the second interim analysis after enrolling 214 evaluable patients, because of the LD arm’s major infection rate surpassing the predefined stopping boundary. In the LD arm, major infections occurred in 31.4% of patients compared with 20.2% of patients in the ND arm, a difference of 11.2% ([95% confidence interval 0.4 to 22.9]; P=0.58). Furthermore, the caloric intake in the LD arm was not improved and nearly two thirds of patients on both diets reported critical nutritional problems. There was no advantage with respect to symptoms, quality of life, or survival for the LD arm. 

Link to Original paper
Link to ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03016130

Asciminib Demonstrates Superior Efficacy and Safety in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in ASC4FIRST [Update trial].

Highlights:

●      In the primary analysis of ASC4FIRST, a phase 3 randomized trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected tyrosine kinase inhibitors (IS-TKIs) in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP), asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy versus (vs.) all IS-TKIs and vs. imatinib in the imatinib stratum, meeting both primary objectives.

●      With longer follow-up, asciminib continued to demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile over IS-TKIs and imatinib, supporting its potential as a treatment option for newly diagnosed CML-CP.

 

In the secondary analysis (2.2 years median follow-up), major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 was 74.1% with asciminib vs. 52.0% with IS-TKIs (treatment difference, 22.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.6%-31.3%; 1-sided P<0.001), and 76.2% with asciminib vs. 47.1% with imatinib in the imatinib stratum (treatment difference, 29.7%; 95% CI, 17.6%-41.8%; 1-sided P<0.001), meeting both key secondary objectives. MMR rate was 72.0% with asciminib vs. 56.9% with second-generation (2G) TKIs (treatment difference, 15.1%; 95% CI, 2.3%-28.0%; 1-sided P<0.05), suggesting possible clinical benefit although the study was not designed to formally confirm statistical significance for this secondary endpoint.

Safety/tolerability remained favorable with asciminib vs. IS-TKIs. Dose reductions and interruptions, respectively, occurred with asciminib (18.5% and 46.5%), imatinib (23.2% and 47.5%), and 2G TKIs (54.9% and 63.7%). The hazard ratio for time to discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events for asciminib vs. 2G TKIs was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.215%-0.997%). 

Link to Original paper

Refining Myeloma Precursors and Their Risk of Progression Through Genomics [Comment;  Section Bridging the Gap of Journal of Clinical Oncology].

This paper summarizes the original study entitled: “Genomics Define Malignant Transformation in Myeloma Precursor Conditions” published in October of this year.

 

Key points:

●      The authors report findings from a large multicenter cohort of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS) and smoldering myeloma (SMM), examining the association of key genomic events with the risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM). This study is significant in that it proposes a genomic definition for precursor conditions, distinguishing two distinct subgroups: one with malignant potential and risk of progression to MM (referred to as genomic MM) and another with an actual premalignant condition with low risk of progression (referred to as genomic MGUS). In patients with genomic MM, the presence of specific mutational signatures (APOBEC, copy number alteration) and MYC and RAS alterations was associated with clinical progression to MM.

●      Genomic classification and refined risk stratification may help guide early treatment for those with genomic MM, preventing end-organ damage as described in the case or supporting de-escalation of follow-up for those with genomic MGUS.

●      The genomic classification of MGUS/SMM as either indolent (genomic MGUS) or transformed with risk of clinical MM progression (genomic MM) represents the first major shift in the definition of myeloma precursor conditions. Its integration into practice will require clinical utility, in addition to the development of streamlined and cost-effective workflows that can be implemented across diverse settings and made widely accessible.

Link to Original paper
Link to accompanying article

Management of Cancer During Pregnancy: ASCO Guideline.  

Key points: See Table 1 and Figure 4 (original paper).

●      Clinicians should order ultrasound as the first-line imaging tool whenever possible due to its safety and absence of radiation exposure

●      Clinicians may administer alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine in the second and third trimesters.

●      Clinicians should not administer methotrexate in any trimester due to its teratogenic and abortifacient effects. Alternative treatments should be offered, or therapy should be delayed until after delivery.

●      Clinicians may administer platinum agents such as carboplatin, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin in the second and third trimesters. Carboplatin is preferred over cisplatin due to lower fetal ototoxicity risks when compared with cisplatin.

●      Clinicians may administer anthracyclines such as doxorubicin, epirubicin, and daunorubicin in the second and third trimesters.

●      Clinicians should avoid the use of idarubicin in all trimesters, due to risk of congenital malformations, fetal cardiotoxicity, and pregnancy loss. If no other anthracycline is felt to be an appropriate substitute, the patient should be counseled about limited safety data for using idarubicin in pregnancy.

●      Clinicians may administer topoisomerase inhibitors such as irinotecan and etoposide in the second and third trimesters.

●      Clinicians may administer vinca alkaloids such as vincristine, vinblastine, and vinorelbine in the second and third trimesters.

●      Clinicians may administer taxanes such as paclitaxel and docetaxel in the second and third trimesters.

●      Clinicians may administer ABL-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib and nilotinib in the second and third trimesters. 

●      Clinicians should not administer dasatinib in any trimester due to risks of teratogenicity, growth restrictions, and spontaneous abortion. Alternative treatments should be offered, or therapy should be delayed until after delivery.

●      Clinicians may administer CD20-targeted agents such as rituximab in the second and third trimesters with close monitoring for fetal development and neonatal hematologic abnormalities.

●      Clinicians should generally avoid antibody-drug conjugates such as brentuximab vedotin, during all trimesters of pregnancy due to concerns for fetal toxicity based on mechanism of action and lack of safety data.

●      Clinicians should avoid the use of checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab in all trimesters due to potential fetal immune system disruption, fetal autoimmune complications, and increased risk of miscarriage, stillbirth, and preterm labor. If use is essential, restrict to 12-32 weeks of gestation.

●      Clinicians may administer interferon-α for chronic myeloid leukemia in any trimester.

●      Clinicians should not use cellular therapies, hematopoietic cell transplant, and radiopharmaceuticals due to insufficient safety evidence. Alternative treatments should be offered, or therapy should be delayed until after delivery.

●      If radiation therapy is required for pregnant patients with cancer, the radiation oncology team should ensure cumulative fetal exposure remains below 100 mGy and use appropriate abdominal shielding to reduce fetal exposure. Abdominal and pelvic radiation should be avoided to minimize fetal risks.

●      Clinicians may offer antiemetics such as ondansetron or metoclopramide for treatment-induced nausea and vomiting. Use of other antiemetic agents such as prochlorperazine, olanzapine, and NK1 receptor antagonists should be guided by multidisciplinary consultation, as efficacy for treatment-induced nausea and vomiting and/or fetal safety data remain limited. Glucocorticoids, preferably prednisolone or methylprednisolone, may be used when needed.

●      Clinicians may offer G-CSF to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia when clinically indicated, such as with myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Decisions should be based on individual risk factors, gestational age, and benefits versus risks.

Link to Original paper

IACH Webinars

Stay tuned for the upcoming IACH webinars

Click here

For questions please contact:
info@clinical-hematology.org


If you prefer not to receive future email communications from us, please unsubscribe here

This newsletter was sent using ITnewsletter