If you have trouble reading this newsletter, view the web version here

   

IACH NEWS OF THE WEEK

September 23, 2025
Prepared by Dr Edwin Uriel Suárez

British Society for Haematology updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of tumour lysis syndrome in adults and children with haematological malignancies: A focus on patient safety

Key points:

●      The definition remains the same as that set out by Cairo and Bishop, 2004. See Table 1 in original article. It is divided into the Laboratory and the Clinical (“overt”) definition of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).

●      Every patient with a haematological malignancy commencing a new line of therapy should have a risk assessment for TLS. This should be personalised and include consideration of disease, patient and therapy factors. See Table 2 in original publication.

 

Prophylaxis of TLS:

●      Patients should be encouraged to drink 2–3 L fluid (children: 2–3 L/m2/day) the day before, the day of and the day after initiation of a new line of therapy. If patients are at high risk for TLS or are unable to consume the recommended amount, then they should be considered for intravenous fluid.

●      Patients with low risk of TLS: consider allopurinol for the first 7 days of the first cycle of treatment.

●      Patients with high risk of TLS: consider intravenous hydration. Consider prophylactic rasburicase (requires refrigeration), 3 mg may be sufficient but may need to be repeated depending on blood tests. Bloods should be monitored at least twice daily but may be required up to 3–4× per day depending on the clinical situation.

●      Patients with intermediate risk of TLS: Oral hydration and allopurinol may be sufficient for these patients but must be considered on a case-by-case basis, as some may warrant a strategy as per high-risk patients.

●      Prophylactic uricosuric drugs should be prescribed and administered prior to the treatment for the haematological malignancy.

●      Debulking strategies may be helpful in reducing the risk of TLS, such as prephase corticosteroids in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

 

Established TLS:

●      Patients with TLS should have vigorous hydration with intravenous fluid, at an initial rate of 3 L/m2/day for adults and up to 4 L/m2/day for children, depending on renal function, clinical and fluid status. The aim is to maintain a urine output of 100 mL/m2/h in adults.

●      Treatment of electrolyte disturbances in TLS should be initiated and managed as per local guidelines and protocols. If refractory to treatment, kidney replacement therapy (KRT) should be considered. The threshold for KRT may be lower than other clinical pathologies.

●      Adult and paediatric patients with established TLS (laboratory or clinical TLS) should be treated with rasburicase 0.2 mg/kg/day for up to 7 days (although 3–5 days is frequently sufficient) with the exact duration based upon clinical response.

●      Allopurinol should be stopped when rasburicase is commenced and can be recommenced 24 h after the last dose of rasburicase.

●      In very unwell, acutely presenting patients, consideration may be made to give rasburicase without waiting for a G6PD result. This decision should be made by the consultant with overall patient responsibility and following thorough evaluation of the risks and benefits.

●      Regular clinical reassessment of the patient's fluid balance status and urine output is required to guide ongoing management. Serum potassium, uric acid, phosphate, calcium and creatinine should be measured every 6–12 h. 

Click for the full article

Reporting blast percentage for response assessment in acute leukemias: recommendations from an EHA/ELN expert panel [Consensus]

Key points: 

●      Over the past two decades, clinical laboratory practices have evolved with advancements in integrated reporting, clinical flow cytometry and access to measurable residual disease (MRD) assays. Strong evidence supports MRD assays in measuring treatment response in acute leukemias.

●      Bone marrows (BMs) to categorise remission status should be performed at count recovery or when count recovery is expected (~day 28-35 with intensive chemotherapy).

●      Two mL of BM per MRD assessment is usually sufficient when peripheral blood counts are near normal. Hemodilution resulting in potentially significant MRD underestimation occurs after the first 2-4 mLs of BM aspiration. EDTA anticoagulant is generally preferred for molecular MRD testing and is also acceptable for cytomorphology and flow cytometry.

●      BM trephine biopsy should be performed when aspirate material is insufficient or at repeat testing when prior BM aspirate is inadequate for differential counting because of insufficient quality, either due to necrosis, fibrosis, hypocellularity, or patchy blast involvement. In these instances touch imprints of the trephine biopsy (ideally 2-3 slides) should be made as they can provide improved cytomorphological assessment in these scenarios.

●      Evaluation criteria for adequate aspirate samples are provided in Table 1 in original paper. 

●      See Figure 1 for Response Assessment in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Figure 2 for Response Assessment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, in original paper. 

Click for the full article

Impact of immunochemotherapy regimens on outcomes of patients with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma in the IELSG37 trial [Post-hoc analysis]

Highlights:

●      The IELSG37 trial (NCT01599559) enrolled 545 adult patients with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL); 268 were in complete metabolic response (CMR) and were randomised to observation or radiotherapy (RT). The study demonstrated that consolidation RT can be omitted in patients with CMR, defined by the Lugano classification as Deauville score (DS) 1–3.

●      R-CHOP21 showed a significantly higher percentage of DS 5 than those on other regimens and may increase the risk of additional treatments and may be inadvisable as frontline therapy for PMBCL.

 

This study evaluates outcomes following different frontline rituximab- and doxorubicin-based immunochemotherapy regimens chosen according to local practice. Patients treated with R-CHOP21 showed a significantly higher percentage of DS 5 than those on other regimens (23.8% vs. 8.2% average, P<0.001). The increased risk of poor response was confirmed in a multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, International Prognostic Index, and performance status. R-CHOP21 was also associated with smaller reductions in metabolic tumor volume and less pronounced decreases in SUVmax. Patients with DS 5 more often received additional treatment (RT and/or salvage chemotherapy with or without autologous consolidation) after induction immunochemotherapy (96% vs. 41%, P< 0.001) and experienced significantly poorer outcomes. Although differences in progression-free and overall survival between R-CHOP21 and more aggressive regimens were not statistically significant. 

Click for the full article
Click for the IESG37 trial

Isatuximab in Relapsed and/or Refractory AL Amyloidosis: Results of a Prospective Phase II Trial (SWOG S1702)

Highlights:

●      Anti-CD38 antibodies have shown efficacy as monotherapy and in combination in a variety of settings for patients with multiple myeloma and light chain (AL) amyloidosis.  

●      Isatuximab (an IgG1k monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to CD38) in relapsed and/or refractory AL amyloidosis resulted in an overall hematologic response rate of 77%. The high rates of hematologic response translated into organ responses and was associated with a good safety profile. 


This multi-center, cooperative group phase 2 trial (NCT03499808) was designed to evaluate hematologic response, organ response, and safety of isatuximab monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed AL amyloidosis. Isatuximab at 20 mg/kg was administered intravenously weekly during the first 28-day cycle and then every other week during cycles 2-24. Forty-three patients were registered, with 35 patients being evaluable for response. The overall hematologic response rate was 77.1%, with 57% of patients achieving a very good partial response or better. The median time to partial response or better was 1.1 months. Renal response occurred in 50% (7/14) of patients with renal involvement and cardiac response occurred in 57% (8/14) of patients who were evaluable utilizing NT-pro-BNP with cardiac involvement. The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events included lymphopenia (n=3, 8.5%) and infection (n=2, 6%).

Click for the full article

Safety and Efficacy of BCMA directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Plasma Cell Leukemia [Retrospective study]

Highlights:  In this study, the researchers demonstrate that patients diagnosed with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) who undergo treatment with standard-of-care chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products exhibit a favorable safety profile and are likely to experience positive outcomes, as indicated by the observed enhancement in treatment outcomes when compared to historical standards.

 

This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with PCL treated with the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR T-cells products idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel; n=34) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; n=15). With a median follow-up of 11.9 months, the overall median progression free survival  (mPFS) was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4-15 months) and the median overall survival (mOS) was 13.0 months (95% CI 8-not estimable (NE) months). The 1-year cumulative incidence of progression or death was 72% and the 1-year cumulative incidence of death was 47%. Patients receiving cilta-cel had a longer mPFS (19.0 months vs. 6.0 months) and mOS (>23 months (NE) vs. 9.0 months) compared to those treated with ide-cel. Similarly, the 1-year cumulative incidence of disease progression or death was 37.5% (95% CI 17.4%-68.5%) with cilta-cel, while all patients treated with ide-cel progressed or died within 12 months of infusion. Rates of hematological and non-hematological toxicities were similar between those patients treated with cilta-cel and ide-cel and consistent with those reported in patients with MM. 

Click for the full article

IACH Webinars

Stay tuned for the upcoming IACH webinars

Click here

For questions please contact:
info@clinical-hematology.org


If you prefer not to receive future email communications from us, please unsubscribe here

This newsletter was sent using ITnewsletter