If you have trouble reading this newsletter, view the web version here

   

IACH NEWS OF THE WEEK

November 30, 2025
Prepared by Dr Edwin Uriel Suárez

Early Positron Emission Tomography Response-Adapted Treatment in Low-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell lymphoma: an open label, multicenter, randomised, noninferiority phase 3 trial.

Highlights:

●      The positron emission tomography (PET) response-tailored treatment approach, based on a PET scan after two cycles of R-CHOP, allowed 77% of patients to de-escalate treatment.

●      The primary endpoint, 3-year non-inferiority in progression-free survival (PFS), was met for the abbreviated immunochemotherapy approach tailored to interim PET response.

 

LNH2009-1B is the largest front-line clinical trial conducted in evaluating treatment de-escalation based on PET after 2 cycles of R-CHOP in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients aged 18 to 80 years without adjusted age International Prognostic Index risk factor. In the experimental PET-adapted arm, patients with negative PET after 2 cycles received in total 4 cycles of R-CHOP, whereas those with positive PET after 2 cycles received in total 6 cycles. In the standard arm, treatment was 6 cycles regardless of PET results after 2 cycles. 650 patients were enrolled, of whom 319 were randomly assigned to the PET-adapted arm and 331 to the standard arm. In the PET-adapted arm, 77.7% of patients had PET negativity after 2 cycles and received in total 4 cycles or R-CHOP. The 3-year PFS in PET-adapted and standard arm were 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-94.5) and 89.2% (95% CI 85.3-92.2), respectively (P=0.070). The non-inferiority of the experimental PET-adapted arm was demonstrated (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.47-1.12, P<0.0001).

Click for the full article

Empirical and targeted antimicrobial therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia and haematological malignancy or after haematopoietic cell transplantation: recommendations from the 10th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia.

Key points:  

Here, the 10th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia panel recommends a personalized approach guided by local resistance patterns and individual risk factors.

●      Empirical antibiotic therapy selection: base empirical therapy on local epidemiology, previous colonisation or infection with resistant bacteria, and the patient’s clinical presentation.

●      Monotherapy versus combination therapy: empirical monotherapy is appropriate for most patients with febrile neutropenia. Consider combination therapy in patients who are haemodynamically unstable or when resistant bacteria are likely.

●      Coverage for resistant bacteria: choose empirical β-lactam therapy targeting known resistant Gram-negative colonisers or previously infecting pathogens. De-escalate therapy to narrower spectrum antibiotics once the patient is clinically stable or when microbiologically documented infection with resistant organisms is not documented. Reserve empirical coverage against resistant Gram-positive bacteria for patients who are haemodynamically unstable, have suspected catheter-related or skin and soft-tissue infections, or have known colonisation with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

●      After 72–96 h, physicians have to reassess the need for continuation, escalation, de-escalation, or discontinuation of empirically started antibiotic therapy based on the patient's clinical condition, documentation of infection, and microbiological results.

○      Persistent fever management: in clinically stable patients with persistent fever during neutropenia, continue diagnostic evaluation and consider non-bacterial causes rather than broaden empirical antibiotic therapy. Clinical algorithms. (Figures 1 and 2 original paper) and recommendations with grading and levels of evidence guide patient management after 72–96 h of empirical therapy.

○      Discontinuation of empirical therapy: consider stopping antibiotics in the following scenarios: after at least 72 h of treatment in patients with fever of unknown origin who remain stable and afebrile for at least 48 h; after completing the intended therapy course in patients with documented infections who are clinically stable and afebrile for at least 72 h, regardless of neutrophil count or duration of neutropenia.

●      Targeted therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: use an active β-lactam as backbone therapy. Consider combination therapy when clinically appropriate or supported by susceptibility testing.

●      Bacteriemia: Duration of therapy should be individualised. A shorter course might be reasonable for patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia who improve rapidly and have no clear focus of infection (at least 7 days) in patients who are afebrile and clinically stable, regardless of neutrophil count and expected duration of neutropenia. In contrast, patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia who have a slower clinical response or a clear focus of infection (eg, typhlitis or pneumonia or perirectal phlegmon) might require a longer treatment course.

Click for the full article

Optimizing lower intensity triplet therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: a practical guide [Review].

Key points: 

In this review, the authors summarize the available evidence for triplet therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and offer their recommendations on the practical application of triplets in clinical practice, with particular focus on adjustments to dosing schedules in induction and continuation cycles.

●      AML is a heterogeneous disease with complex clonal ontogeny. Various triplet therapies aim to build on  the foundation of hypomethylating agent + venetoclax doublets to target leukemic clones and pre-empt primary and secondary mechanisms of resistance and relapse.

●      Frontline triplet therapy incorporating a targeted therapy (FLT3, IDH or menin inhibitor) is an emerging treatment concept under investigation for this population. Initial triplet regimens have yielded encouraging composite complete remission and measurable residual disease negativity rates, enabling the transition to allogeneic stem cell transplantation for eligible patients.

●      While continued therapy appears to be necessary to maintain remission, the question of whether all three agents are required indefinitely remains unanswered.

●      Oral formulations of decitabine and azacitidine with cedazuridine will hopefully soon enable general adoption of total oral therapy for AML.

●      While effective, triplets are associated with myelosuppression and cytopenia-related toxicities, which can affect treatment tolerability and quality of life.

●      See Figure 3 (original paper) for recommended schedules of triplet combinations. 

Click for the full article

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Adults [Review].

Key points: 

In this review, the authors focus on adult-onset secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and explore the latest updates on its pathophysiology, triggers, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management. Please note that primary HLH is reviewed separately in a companion article in this series.

 

●      Secondary HLH more commonly presents in adults and is a heterogeneous disorder with various potential triggers ranging from infections to malignancy, autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency, and medications.

●      The pro-inflammatory “cytokine storm” created by persistent immune activation causes prolonged fevers with temperatures above 38.5°F, a near-universal clinical finding at initial presentation (over 95% of cases).

●      The activated macrophages not only contribute to the inflammatory milieu, but infiltrate into reticuloendothelial organs such as the spleen, liver, and lymph nodes, manifesting as splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, and lymphadenopathy, respectively.

●      Macrophages also infiltrate the bone marrow and phagocytose both mature and precursor hematopoietic cells, which in conjunction with suppression of hematopoiesis by inflammatory cytokines, contribute to eventual multilineage cytopenias and associated symptoms.

○      Of note, cytopenia takes time to develop and may not always be observed in the early stages of HLH; in fact, reactive leukocytosis may be observed early in the disease course in response to acute inflammation.

●      From the laboratory perspective, a progressive rise in serum ferritin is a hallmark of HLH. The median ferritin in HLH on presentation ranges from 5000-14000ug/L.

●      In patients with suspected HLH, a search for underlying diseases and environmental triggers can consolidate the clinical picture. In the United States, the most commonly associated conditions include malignancy, infections, autoimmune disorders, prior organ transplant, and congenital immunodeficiency syndromes. Of these triggers, congenital immunodeficiency syndromes have been associated with the highest in-hospital mortality rate, followed closely by malignancy and infections. Other less common causes of secondary HLH include pregnancy and certain therapeutics, such as drugs and immunotherapy.

○      In up to 36% of patients, an underlying trigger or associated condition is not identified, even after systematic and thorough evaluation.

●      In cases of secondary HLH associated with malignancy, the underlying malignancy is often not immediately obvious at presentation and may only be identified after systematic evaluation, which can include peripheral blood flow cytometry, positron emission tomography–computed tomography imaging, and/or tissue biopsy.

○      An elevated soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R)/ferritin increases suspicion for an underlying lymphoid malignancy, as the mean sIL-2R/ferritin ratio has been shown to be significantly higher in lymphoma-associated HLH compared to HLH in the absence of malignancy (8.6 versus 0.7, respectively).

●      The updated HLH-2024 criteria have only been validated in children with familial HLH, where fulfillment of 5 of the 7 remaining diagnostic criteria was associated with 99% accuracy when tested against cases of infection and other causes of systemic inflammation.

○      The Hscore (diagnostic score) is not intended for use as a diagnostic criterion, and the HLH-2004/HLH-2024 (in combination with clinical gestalt) remains the diagnostic framework utilized in most studies on adult HLH.

●      The general approach to treatment is two-fold – 1) management of the underlying condition suspected to trigger HLH (e.g. malignancy, infection, or autoimmune processes) and 2) administration of HLH-directed therapy targeting the underlying immune dysfunction and inflammation.

○      The HLH-94 protocol is the standard treatment for HLH initially developed by the International Histiocyte Society in the pediatric population, and consists of induction with etoposide and dexamethasone (with the option to administer up to 4 doses of intrathecal methotrexate for abnormal cerebrospinal fluid findings or neurologic symptoms). In individuals with primary HLH or refractory disease, this is typically followed by maintenance therapy with etoposide, dexamethasone and cyclosporine A, as a bridge to eventual consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). 

○      In adult secondary HLH, there is no established standard treatment regimen. Treatment of the precipitating cause and associated cytokine storm are critical and should be prioritized. The HLH-94 protocol has been adopted for use in select cases of adult secondary HLH, with limitations. Specifically, HLH-94 is a highly toxic regimen, particularly in older adults or individuals with organ dysfunction. As such, HLH-94 is frequently deferred in favor of anti-inflammatory agents (e.g. corticosteroids, ruxolitinib) and continued management of underlying triggers, at least until lymphoid malignancy can be definitively ruled out.

○      For certain malignancies such as lymphoma, etoposide (which depletes activated T cells) can be incorporated into the standard-of-care chemotherapy regimen. For example, dose adjusted EPOCH +/- rituximab followed by autologous stem cell transplant in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma-associated HLH has demonstrated high efficacy and safety in a phase II trial.

○      Clinicians frequently encounter the dilemma of starting multiagent chemotherapy in the setting of significant renal and liver dysfunction, which impact drug metabolism and augment toxicities. In such cases, conventional steroids, anti-inflammatory immunosuppressive agents (e.g. ruxolitinib, anakinra, intravenous immunoglobulin), or dose-reduced etoposide may be started until anti-neoplastic chemotherapy can be safely given.

○      In contrast to primary pediatric HLH where allogeneic HSCT is typically the definitive therapy after disease control is achieved (given the underlying genetic drivers), it is performed less frequently in secondary HLH. HSCT is typically only considered for adults with relapsed/refractory secondary HLH, or in some cases as consolidation for lymphoma or leukemia-associated HLH. 

Click for the full article

IACH Webinars

Stay tuned for the upcoming IACH webinars

Click here

For questions please contact:
info@clinical-hematology.org


If you prefer not to receive future email communications from us, please unsubscribe here

This newsletter was sent using ITnewsletter