If you have trouble reading this newsletter, view the web version here

   

IACH NEWS OF THE WEEK

March 10, 2026
Prepared by Dr Edwin Uriel Suárez

Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma With CHOP and Anti-CD20 Therapy

15-Year Follow-Up of the SWOG S0016 Trial [Secondary analysis]  

Highlights:

●      Follicular lymphoma (FL) has historically been regarded as incurable, with patients experiencing late relapses after initial chemoimmunotherapy treatment.

●      The results of this analysis suggest that a subset of patients with advanced-stage FL can achieve a cure with CHOP-based chemoimmunotherapy (cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin/doxorubicin, oncovin, and prednisone/

prednisolone), as relapse rates decline over time. This finding represents a paradigm shift in the understanding of and approach to FL, with implications for initial patient discussions and future research strategies.

 

In this analysis of the multicenter SWOG S0016 trial of 531 individuals with untreated, advanced-stage FL, the overall 15-year overall survival was 70%, and cure modeling estimated an overall cure rate of 42%. Patients were randomized to receive either rituximab plus CHOP or CHOP followed by radioimmunotherapy. The median follow-up was 15.5 years, and the rate of relapse declined substantially over time, from 6.8% during the first 5 years to 0.6% between 15 and 20 years.

Click for the full article

Consensus recommendations from the 2024 International Follicular Lymphoma Scientific Workshop 

Key points: 

This report focuses on updates in follicular lymphoma (FL) biology, first-line treatment, the role of progression of disease in 24 months, clinical trial design, and redefining cure in FL.

●      FL  is an indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, in which most patients harbor the t(14;18) chromosomal translocation,  resulting in overexpression of the B-cell lymphoma 2 protein.

●      Recurrent mutations in epigenetic modifier genes, such as those encoding for acetyltransferases (eg, CREBBP) and methyltransferases (eg, KMT2D and EZH2), have emerged as genetic hallmarks of the disease, occurring early in the common mutated precursor cell, preceding its final clonal expansion into FL or transformed FL.

●      FL is a heterogeneous disease composed of distinct genomic, transcriptomic, and immunologic subtypes that are still being defined.

●      Multiple clinical and clinicogenetic risk scores (Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index [FLIPI], FLIPI-2, m7FLIPI, PRIMA-PI, others)  have been developed to identify patients at low and high risk. However, these scores were developed in historical cohorts and do not perform as well for patients receiving current standard treatments. Furthermore, they do not guide treatment decisions.

●      Prospective trials have even shown that watchful waiting can be used for ≥10 years for a small subset of patients, suggesting that some patients require minimal therapy.

●      Outcomes with current frontline therapies are variable, with some patients achieving a functional cure (with ongoing remissions beyond 15 years) and others experiencing primary refractory disease or transformation.  FL has historically been considered an incurable disease. With more effective therapies, the authors advocate changing the terminology.

○      A subset of patients (20%-40%) have disease control lasting ≥10 years with rituximab treatment alone.

○      ~20% of patients will have progression of disease within 24 months after initial chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), including some with transformed disease. Such patients are poorly served by initial treatment and would benefit from alternative frontline treatments.

○      Frontline CIT is associated with infections, hematologic side effects, and secondary malignancies. Growing evidence suggests that bendamustine-based therapy may have increased long-term risks compared to other frontline approaches.

■      Maintenance rituximab for 2 years after CIT induction extends progression-free survival (PFS) but does not improve overall survival.

●      Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting CD3×CD20 (mosunetuzumab and epcoritamab) are approved by the US FDA for patients with multiple relapsed FL.  BsAbs have demonstrated high response rates (overall response rate, 78%-96%) and durable remissions (PFS, 15-24 months) in phase 2 trials among patients who had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy.

○      In addition, phase 2 trials have demonstrated encouraging results with BsAbs as initial therapy, either as monotherapy or in combination with lenalidomide.

●      See Table 2 in original paper for Ongoing phase 3 clinical trials with BsAbs in frontline FL.

●      Efforts are underway to develop surrogate end points that can identify a winning treatment regimen more rapidly. Complete response rate at 30 months has been established as a surrogate end point for PFS in first-line FL therapy based on a large analysis of 13 randomized trials of induction and maintenance therapy in FL.

Click for the full article

Is “severe” idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD)‐ idiopathic plasmacytic lymphadenopathy (IPL) really severe? [Letter; Retrospective, single‐center study]

Highlights: 

These findings suggest that disease severity, as currently defined by the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network (CDCN) criteria, may not adequately reflect prognosis or guide treatment in patients with idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD)‐idiopathic plasmacytic lymphadenopathy (IPL).

 

A total of 338 patients were included in the study, comprising 152 with iMCD-IPL and 186 with iMCD‐not otherwise specified (iMCD-NOS). According to the CDCN‐defined severity criteria, patients were stratified into four groups: severe iMCD‐IPL (n=37), non‐severe iMCD‐IPL (n=115), severe iMCD‐NOS (n=52), and non‐severe iMCD‐NOS (n=134).  See Figure 1 in original paper for Clinical and laboratory characteristics of iMCD-NOS and iMCD‐IPL patients stratified by severity. CDCN‐defined severity criteria were not associated with overall survival or time to next treatment among iMCD‐IPL patients (See Figure 2 in original paper). 

Click for the full article

Development of a prognostic scoring system for chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase [Retrospective & prospective multicenter cohort] 

Highlights: 

Currently there is no established prognostic scoring system for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast phase (BP). This study aimed to identify prognostic factors of CML-BP and to develop a readily available prognostic scoring system at the onset of BP to enable future comparison across trials and series.

 

The analyses were based on 275 patients from thirteen countries, collected within the European LeukemiaNet Blast Phase Registry with a median observation time of 45 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 18.9 months. The study identified six independent prognostic factors: blast percentage, platelet count, age (all at onset of CML-BP), immunophenotype of BP, extramedullary disease, and previous history of CML. The low-risk group, encompassing 14% of patients, had a median OS of 97 months, the intermediate-risk group (59% of patients) of 22 months, and the high-risk group (27% of patients) of 9 months. Cross-validation demonstrated a good performance of the score, although external validation is strongly recommended.

Click for the full article

The Care and Cure of the Leukemias in 2026 [Critical Review]. 

Key points:

●      Currently, most leukemias are effectively treated with immunotherapies (highly effective monoclonal antibodies targeting CD19 [blinatumomab], or CD22 [inotuzumab ozogamicin]), BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; e.g., dasatinib, ponatinib), Bruton TKIs (e.g., ibrutinib, acalabrutinib), BCL-2 inhibitors (venetoclax), IDH1/2 inhibitors (ivosidenib, olutasidenib, and enasidenib), FLT3 inhibitors (e.g., midostaurin, quizartinib, and gilteritinib), menin inhibitors (revumenib, ziftomenib), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies.

○      These novel agents and their judicious use in combination strategies have transformed the treatment landscape across all leukemias, significantly increasing survival, and quality of life for patients, and attenuated the need for intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

●      Leukemia subtypes, such as Philadelphia (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; incurable before 2000) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; previously considered incurable), with historically dire prognoses were recently transformed to favorable leukemias with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 80+% and 90+%, respectively.

●      BCR::ABL1 TKIs resulted in normal life expectancy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

●      Notable advances have also been made in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with targeted therapies, although some subsets (older/unfit patients for intensive chemotherapy, complex karyotype, TP53-mutated, KMT2A-rearranged, and treated secondary AML) still have unfavorable outcomes.

●      Favorable leukemias are: hairy cell leukemia (%cure rate/survival rate [Cr/Sr]: 97/10-year; see Figure 1 in original paper), acute promyelocytic leukemia (Cr/Sr: 90-95/10-year), Core-binding factor-AML (Cr/Sr: 80/10-year), Ph-positive ALL (Cr/Sr: 85-90/4-year; see Figure 4 in original paper), ALL patients aged <60 years (Cr/Sr: 85-88/5-year; see Figure 5 in original paper), CML (Cr/Sr: 85-90/10-year; see Figure 2 in original paper), CLL (Cr/Sr: 90+/5-year; see Figure 3 in original paper). For intermediate- and unfavorable-risk leukemias, see Table 1 in original paper (Current and projected therapies at MD Anderson in 2026 and expected outcomes). 

Click for the full article

IACH Webinars

Stay tuned for the upcoming IACH webinars

Click here

For questions please contact:
info@clinical-hematology.org


If you prefer not to receive future email communications from us, please unsubscribe here

This newsletter was sent using ITnewsletter