If you have trouble reading this newsletter, view the web version here

   

IACH NEWS OF THE WEEK

March 18, 2026
Prepared by Dr Edwin Uriel Suárez

Bleeding Risk with Apixaban vs. Rivaroxaban in Acute Venous Thromboembolism [Phase 3 clinical trial]. 

As we mentioned in a previous post (News of the Week – July 2, 2025), the abstract presented at the 2025 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Congress has finally been published in full.

 

Highlights: 

Among patients with acute venous thromboembolism, the risk of clinically relevant bleeding was significantly lower with apixaban than with rivaroxaban during the 3-month treatment period.

 

In this international prospective, 1:1 ratio randomized, open-label, blinded end-point designed trial (COBRRA), eligible patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism or proximal deep-vein thrombosis were assigned to receive apixaban (n=1370) or rivaroxaban (n=1390) for 3 months. Apixaban was given at a dose of 10 mg twice daily for 7 days followed by 5 mg twice daily, and rivaroxaban was given at a dose of 15 mg twice daily for 21 days followed by 20 mg daily. The primary outcome was clinically relevant bleeding, a composite of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, as defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, during the 3-month trial period. A primary-outcome event occurred in 44 of 1345 patients (3.3%) in the apixaban group and 96 of 1355 patients (7.1%) in the rivaroxaban group (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.65; P<0.001). 

Click for link 1
Click for link 2

CPX-351 vs daunorubicin, cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in older adults with non–adverse-risk AML: the NCRI AML18 trial. 

Highlights: 

Response and survival were better with daunorubicin/cytarabine plus fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin, including in those patients with myelodysplasia (MDS)-related mutations.

 

Daunorubicin/cytarabine plus fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin (DAGO2) with CPX-351 (CPX; 1:2 randomization) were compared in 439 patients with AML aged ≥60 years (median age, 68 years) without known adverse-risk cytogenetics. Median follow-up was 35 months. Patients not in measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission after course 1 could enter a second randomization between standard and intensified chemotherapy. Post–course 1, the overall response rate (ORR; complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete hematological recovery) was greater after DAGO2 (60% vs 47.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.61; P=0.016). Following course 2, the ORR was not significantly different (85% for DAGO2 vs 78% for CPX; P=0.095). More patients attained CR with MRD negativity after course 1 in the DAGO2 arm (47% vs 29% for CPX; OR, 0.46; P=0.004). Better 3-year event-free survival (34% vs 27%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; P=0.012) and overall survival (52% vs 35%; HR, 0.62;  P=0.001) with DAGO2 was observed. CPX did not provide a survival benefit in patients with MDS–related mutations and was associated with poorer survival in patients with NPM1 (HR, 2.83) and FLT3 mutations (HR, 2.14). Overall, 37% of patients underwent transplantation in first remission, with no difference in transplantation frequency or survival after transplant between randomization groups. Among patients entering the course 2 randomization (n=107), survival was equivalent between standard and intensified CPX doses (P=0.565).  

Click for link 1
Click for link 2

The prevalence and clinical significance of clonal monocytosis [Retrospective study].

Highlights:

-        Clonal monocytosis of undetermined significance (CMUS) and clonal cytopenia and monocytosis of undetermined significance (CCMUS) are distinct states within the spectrum of clonal haematopoiesis that are  associated with a high risk of myeloid neoplasia (MN).

-        Using sex-specific monocyte thresholds and excluding isolated DNMT3A mutations refines the association between CMUS and MN.

 

Through the analysis of clinical, genomic, and health outcome data from 431,531 UK Biobank participants, the authors found that CMUS with an absolute monocytosis and CCMUS are high-risk entities strongly associated with incident MN, as well as cardiovascular and renal disease. They note the higher overall monocyte counts in men and the low progression rate of DNMT3A-CMUS. They show that amending the CMUS/CCMUS definition to include sex-specific monocyte thresholds (for males: monocytes ≥0.6 x 109/L and ≥11.5% of the white blood count)  and excluding isolated DNMT3A mutations, significantly strengthens the association with incident MN. Finally, given their association with poor outcomes, the authors developed MoSAIC, a machine learning classifier that can deduce the presence of SRSF2 mutations (associated with high risk of MN) in individuals with monocytosis, based solely on complete blood count indices. The researchers corroborated their findings in an independent cohort of 625,328 Danish primary care patients. 

Click for the full article

Therapy of high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes [Review]. 

Key points: 

This review outlines the current landscape of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) management, focusing on risk stratification, treatment options, and challenges.

●      HR-MDS is a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic malignancies primarily affecting the elderly, characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, cytopenias, and a risk of transformation to acute myeloblastic leukemia.

●      The International Prognostic Scoring Systems (IPSS-R and IPSS-M) classify patients into risk categories, integrating cytogenetics and molecular data to guide therapy.

●      Hypomethylating agents remain the standard of care for non-transplant-eligible patients, though their efficacy varies, with median overall survival ranging from 13-19 months.

●      Promising novel agents include anti-apoptotic drugs (e.g., venetoclax), mutation-targeted drugs (e.g., TP53, IDH1/2), signal transduction inhibitors, inflammation pathway inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

●      Combinations of hypomethylating agents and these novel agents have shown promise in early trials as initial or salvage therapy but have failed to improve survival in phase III studies.

●      Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only potentially curative option, yet its applicability is limited by patient age, comorbidities, and donor availability.

●      Post-transplant relapse monitoring via chimerism and measurable residual disease is critical, with preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion recommended for relapse prevention.

●      Future research should focus on mutation-driven therapies and inclusive trial designs to optimize HR-MDS management. 

Click for the full article

Prognosis in marginal zone lymphoma: a comprehensive review. 

Key points:

●      Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) represent a distinct subset of indolent B-cell lymphomas, including extranodal, nodal, and splenic variants.

●      MZLs account for 7-8% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, representing the third most common type of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

●      The incidence of MZL has increased by approximately 1% per year, likely due to improved diagnostic tools.

○      MZLs encompass three pathology subtypes: extranodal MZL (EMZL) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma), splenic MZL (SMZL), and nodal MZL (NMZL).

○      Despite shared histopathological and immunophenotypic features, their clinical presentation varies significantly based on the site of origin and genetic abnormalities.

●      Chronic antigenic stimulation leads to the expansion of reactive B-cell clones, eventually resulting in malignant transformation. Key genetic alterations identified in MZL, comprising mutations in NOTCH2, KLF2, and TNFAIP3 genes, affect critical pathways regulating cell survival, proliferation, and immune response.

●      Several prognostic tools have been developed to refine risk assessment in MZL subtypes, including the MALT-International Prognostic Index (MALT-IPI), the Haemoglobin Platelets Lactate Dehydrogenase Lymphadenopathy  score and its simplified version. Recently, the MZL-International Prognostic Index (MZL-IPI) has emerged as a comprehensive model integrating data from all MZL subtypes and incorporating rigorously validated clinical parameters (See Table 1 and Figure 1 in original paper).

●      MZL typically has an indolent course, with early-stage disease having an excellent prognosis. Both gastric and extragastric MALT lymphomas exhibit favourable survival outcomes, with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates exceeding 90% and 10-year survival rates of 75-80%. SMZL also generally has a good prognosis, with about two-thirds of patients surviving five years post diagnosis and around 20% remaining therapy-free for several years.

●      With the introduction of the CD20 antibody rituximab in the treatment, the prognosis of NMZL has improved over the last few years. In different case series, the OS at 5 years was between 57% and 97%; the heterogeneity of the diagnosis might partially explain this difference because of the changes in the pathological delineation and the staging procedures, as well as in the treatment.

●      Although the median survival exceeds 10 years, MZL still negatively impacts life expectancy compared with the general population, with the exception of gastric MALT, which has a survival similar to that of the general population, especially when diagnosed in early stages.

○      In EMZL recurrence is common, affecting 50-60% of patients, with a median time to relapse of approximately 5 years.

○      One-third of patients with SMZL may develop an aggressive disease course, with a median survival of approximately 4 years.

●      Furthermore, early disease progression (i.e. progression of disease at 24 months) and histological aggressive transformation (HT) have emerged as key adverse prognostic factors in relapsed/refractory (R/R) MZL, similar to other indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

●      Treatment strategies vary according to subtype and disease stage. Overall, therapeutic approaches follow general principles:

○      If an infectious pathogenetic association exists, it is treated regardless of disease stage and symptoms.

○      Radiotherapy is used with curative intent for localized disease.

○      Systemic treatments are generally deferred until symptoms arise.

○      In R/R setting, when HT is excluded, the use of non-cross-resistant chemotherapies is being increasingly replaced by targeted immunotherapies.

○      Emerging monoclonal antibodies such as tafasitamab and loncastuximab, and bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy  are currently being evaluated in R/R MZL. 

Click for the full article

Chronic graft-versus-host disease: Current situation and unmet needs — A European position statement [Bone Marrow Transplantation Journal Perspective].

Key points: 

This European position statement provides a comprehensive and forward-looking synthesis of the evolving biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), while highlighting critical unmet needs that impede progress.

●      Historically, cGVHD has been reported in approximately 30–50% of long-term survivors following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). However, this figure is highly variable and dependent on patient selection, donor type, HLA matching, conditioning intensity, and prophylaxis regimen.

●      cGVHD arises from a complex interplay of immune dysregulation, aberrant tissue repair, and progressive fibrosis, resulting in a heterogeneous clinical spectrum that profoundly impairs quality of life and functional status.

●      Persistent challenges in diagnosis, staging reproducibility, integration of patient-reported outcomes, and harmonized clinical trial endpoints further limit clinical and regulatory advancement.

●      The clinical manifestations of cGVHD may involve almost any organ system, with varying degrees of inflammatory and fibrotic injury (See Table 2 in original paper).

●      Although recent therapeutic innovations—including JAK inhibition, ROCK2 inhibition, and CSF-1R–directed therapies—have expanded options beyond corticosteroids, treatment responses remain variable, and optimal sequencing, biomarkers of activity, and organ-specific strategies are lacking.

○      Approximately 50–60% of patients with cGVHD will develop steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent disease, a scenario historically associated with poor outcomes and high morbidity.

○      Over the past decade, several agents with distinct mechanisms of action have received regulatory approval, marking a significant paradigm shift in cGVHD management.

○      The substantial pharmaco-economic burden of cGVHD underscores the urgency of developing more effective, durable, and accessible interventions.

●      Preventing cGVHD remains one of the central challenges in allo-HCT. Current research and clinical practice have therefore shifted toward optimizing prophylactic regimens, promoting controlled immune reconstitution, and implementing early immune modulatory interventions guided by biomarkers and precision tools. The refinement of GVHD prophylaxis has evolved from non-specific immunosuppression to more tailored strategies balancing graft-versus-leukemia effects and immune tolerance. 

Click for the full article

IACH Webinars

Stay tuned for the upcoming IACH webinars

Click here

For questions please contact:
info@clinical-hematology.org


If you prefer not to receive future email communications from us, please unsubscribe here

This newsletter was sent using ITnewsletter